MailerContribSuite::testSimple
*** Assertion failed!
at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Assert.pm line 64
Assert::ASSERT(undef) called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki.pm line 3425
Foswiki::topicExists('Foswiki=HASH(0x1e39e5a0)', 'TemporaryMailerContribTestsUsersWeb', 'TestGroup') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Users/TopicUserMapping.pm line 605
Foswiki::Users::TopicUserMapping::eachGroupMember('Foswiki::Users::TopicUserMapping=HASH(0x1e383d98)', 'TestGroup') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Users.pm line 820
Foswiki::Users::eachGroupMember('Foswiki::Users=HASH(0x1e3844d8)', 'TestGroup') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Func.pm line 960
Foswiki::Func::eachGroupMember('TestGroup') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/MailerContrib/WebNotify.pm line 129
Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify::subscribe('Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify=HASH(0x1e459398)', 'TestGroup', '*', 0, 0) called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/Maile
Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify::_load('Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify=HASH(0x1e459398)') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/MailerContrib/WebNotify.pm line 5
Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify::new('Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::WebNotify', 'TemporaryMailerContribTestsTestWebMailerContribTests', 'WebNotify') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib
Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::_processWeb('TemporaryMailerContribTestsTestWebMailerContribTests') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/MailerContrib.pm line 91
Foswiki::Contrib::MailerContrib::mailNotify('ARRAY(0x1e21ce48)', 0, undef, 0, 0) called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/test/unit/MailerContrib/MailerContribSuite.pm line 280
MailerContribSuite::testSimple('MailerContribSuite=HASH(0x1dee34c8)') called at /var/www/SVN/foswiki/core/lib/Unit/TestRunner.pm line 311
Fixed with SMELL. I'm untainting the subscriber without validation. The subscriber has already passed through the Email validations and local email validations. I suspect this should be safe, but needs validation.
--
GeorgeClark - 27 May 2010
Reviewed, thanks George. Though I don't understand why the untaint is required there (it definitely is)
--
CrawfordCurrie - 27 May 2010
Reopening to apply the same patch to 1.0.10. Changing status to waiting for release,
The copyright of the content on this website is held by the contributing authors, except where stated elsewhere. see CopyrightStatement. 
