NOTE: If you are a developer, please use a private wiki based on foswiki/trunk on a daily base ...or use
trunk.foswiki.org to view this page for some minimal testing.
Use
Item11383 for general documentation changes for release 1.1.5. Use
Item9693 for docu changes for release 2.0.
Item8628: The clause order with two elements doesn't work
| Priority: |
CurrentState: |
AppliesTo: |
Component: |
WaitingFor: |
| Normal |
No Action Required |
Web Site |
QuerySearchPatternCookbook? |
|
--
JoseCarlosMartins - 26 Feb 2010
Dear Crawford, I have been tryiing to use the
QuerySearch? macro and the clause order with two or more elements, but I haven't been successfull at all. This example below was extracted from the
QuerySearchPatternCookbook.
--
JoseCarlosMartins - 10 Sep 2010
In these topic there are an example (third example) with a clause order with two elements, but it doesn't work.
I create a
DataForm? where I'd like to make a search and classify the results with 2 formfields, but I never can't do this. I found these example but in my tests it doesn't work.
Are there any tip to do it work?
Thanks.
José Carlos Martins.
Alpargatas - Brazil
Report is apparently against
QuerySearchPatternCookbook. However there is no such topic in the release. There
is a
SearchPatternCookbook - is that what you meant? or perhaps you meant
QuerySearch? In which case,
specifically which example are you referring to?
--
CrawfordCurrie - 08 Sep 2010
- source of the example that I mentioned:
The example in the cookbook is wrong, it was a new topic that is not fully baked.
System.QuerySearchPatternCookbook. I've updated the example a bit and verified it in the Sandbox web.
Changing this task to No Action Required. The topic is not in the release, so it is not managed by the Tasks system.
--
GeorgeClark - 13 Mar 2011